Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH
Blog EntryMar 13, '08 2:36 AM
for everyone
Here's the thing: I am even surprised that she's called a journalist. She did make good points about journalists having to put their names (and thereby there credibility) as an identity stamp of sorts on the pieces they write. How she does not mention having balls to withstand nasty comments and mud-slinging escapes me. You're in the world where people smile charmingly say something and mean a totally different thing. You should be less thick in the head.

Read Malu Fernandez's article here

Journalism and blogging ARE two different mediums, although both are rooted in the fine (sometimes not-so) composition of a piece. Blogging is a culture, journalism is a craft. Sometimes, the two overlap, but there are certain distinctions.

Blogs are supposed to be personal commentaries based on perhaps self-promotion and the effort to illicit strong responses to what one has written. Yeah, journalism is that, but it hardly is rooted in personal opinion. Unless you're writing an opinion column, which you seem to have been doing for a long time.

While blogging is a commentary, journalism is telling a story based on facts. Blogging is participatory journalism, where citizens get involved with the latest news by gathering, analyzing, and disseminating facts. However, blogging is usually tainted with personal opinion, a thing journalists should stay away from when delivering news. However, it remains the same that in both, what you put into words create reactions, whether you like it or not.

Journalism is about letting your balls hang out there and brace yourself for smashing or stroking because it's what the job entails. Blogging, meanwhile, allows one the liberty to hide behind false names (thus, usernames) or anonymity. I do understand that it can get frustrating, annoying, or even hurtful that some people "hide behind a false name" because of "cowardice", but that's one of the risks when you start a blog. And have you even read the "Letters to the Editor" section? NOT EVERYONE gives their name when expressing opposition. Even if they do put names, how sure are you anyway that it's their real name?

Hiding behind anonymity is part of one's freedom of speech. The right to state an opinion coupled with responsibility does not require one to put a face behind the shout or whisper. Nominal identity and self-expression are not necessarily tied together. It's not exactly the name beside the opinion that matters, but what one says. Well, some situations may require a person to identify himself when expressing something, but in blogging, you shouldn't hold it against people if they don't want to identify themselves.

If you still want to write, STOP WHINING. It's part of the job. There are times that you are lauded for your brilliance and there are times when you'd get tied down to a chair and will be forced to eat your own words. This time, maybe you should go grab a glass of water, a plate, and cutlery. Expect another barrage of angry comments regarding your "Perhaps it is the Filipino culture to foster backstabbing because they never mean what they say face to face" statement. Dear God, woman, do you not learn? Has the fat finally gotten to your brain and made you impossibly thick? You got blasted the last time you made a sweeping statement of your countrymen and now, you're just stirring the hornet's nest.

I am not a person who would overlook flaws and blindly highlight the beauty of Filipino culture, but i have to say this: HOW THE FUCK DID YOU COME UP WITH THAT CONCLUSION? Is backstabbing mutually exclusive to our culture? Remember Brutus? Benedict Arnold? Do you not watch Mexican telenovelas?

Ms Fernandez, stop whining and start defending. You have at least 15 minutes before the first wave of angry (and to piss you off more, anonymous) comments coming your way. Here's a bat and a shield. You have three minutes. Go.

23 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
glyzkietot wrote on Mar 13, '08
naghahanap na naman b ng away? hahaha
shelah wrote on Mar 13, '08
are you talking about her or me? haha!
35664 wrote on Mar 13, '08
and yet, she still has a job. there are other people out there who are smarter and can write better. para kayang diary entry yung "article" niya.
shelah wrote on Mar 13, '08
there's a grey area between blogging and participatory journalism.

the area is big and is called 'malu fernandez'.
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 13, '08
blogging is also a craft, especially for those who do it professionally. bloggers are not given professional courtesy in the way some journalists are given it, simply because blogging has been seen as an 'upstart' craft with no concrete ethical/professional guidelines.

but journalism started out that way, right? many mainstream publishing giants are just starting to realize how they've neglected to work with blogging and its influence.

re blogging and journalism as two different mediums, i think the shift has already started. the spheres are overlapping, yes, and in many ways bloggers can cry foul from bona fide journalists who copy their stories without proper accreditation.

i agree; blogging can be centered on participatory journalism; the media has changed so fast, and people have more access to different sources of news and communication. the fourth estate do not have a monopoly over quality reportage at this time. gates that have been traditionally closed to the public are now open. the quality may vary from blog to blog, but the decision is solely in the hands of the user.

But blogging, aside from Perez Hilton and the other big time bloggers (you know who you are) is for me a slacker job or a medium and pastime for lonely people to connect.

hell of a statement to make, ms. fernandez.
shelah wrote on Mar 13, '08
Good points.

Blogging and journalism have started to overlap, as several journalists started their own blogs while keeping their jobs as reporters/correspondents. Publishing companies have expanded from print to Internet. The grey area between the two is vast, but what distinguishes one from the other?

Opening the so-called gates to the public does leave quality to the discretion of the user. This, I think, is one of the distinguishing factors between blogging and journalism. Articles and stories run through editors first before getting published while blog posts do not. Well, unless it is an online newspaper. See? Grey area!

I think Ms Fernandez banks her claims on the fact that you mentioned: the absence of solid guidelines in blogging make it a sphere where bloggers are rabid ferrets that run around and participate in 'vicious blogging'. Maybe she should show more respect to bloggers. I mean, these are the people who made that brilliant film 'Snakes on a Plane" happen.
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 13, '08
shelah said
The grey area between the two is vast, but what distinguishes one from the other?
i would assume the inherent flexibility in the blogging application is what most traditional newsrooms have yet to figure out, and is probably the most telling difference. that, and the near-automatic respect a journalist gets, as opposed to the reaction a 'mere' blogger is given.
shelah wrote on Mar 13, '08
the inherent flexibility in the blogging application
exactly.

Photobucket
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 13, '08, edited on Mar 13, '08
shelah said
I think Ms Fernandez banks her claims on the fact that you mentioned: the absence of solid guidelines in blogging make it a sphere where bloggers are rabid ferrets that run around and participate in 'vicious blogging'.
ms. fernandez conveniently forgets the existence of stellar journalistic outfits such as Britain's The Sun and The New York Post.

in every profession, you will find the cream of the crop, and you will find the detritus. again, for her to make a blanket statement on blogging simply because of its origins has no bearing today, because the tool itself has evolved.
shelah wrote on Mar 13, '08
ms. fernandez conveniently forgets the existence of stellar journalistic outfits such as Britain's The Sun and The New York Post.

in every profession, you will find the cream of the crop, and you will find the detritus. again, for her to make a blanket statement on blogging simply because of its origins has no bearing today, because the tool itself has evolved.
come to think of it, did any newspaper slam her and her previous "indiscretion"?
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 13, '08
shelah said
come to think of it, did any newspaper slam her and her previous "indiscretion"?
i don't know of any, but i never followed the whole 'indiscretion' comprehensively.
laikaken wrote on Mar 13, '08
eto ba yung same writer na gusto patayin ni mara?
35664 wrote on Mar 13, '08
shelah said
the area is big and is called 'malu fernandez'.
that's one big fat grey area.
35664 wrote on Mar 13, '08
shelah said
Articles and stories run through editors first before getting published while blog posts do not.
and still we see articles like malu's in print. what does that say about their editor?
shelah wrote on Mar 14, '08
LOL

er...i'm not so sure. either way, both are, uh...horizontally challenged.
shelah wrote on Mar 14, '08
sometimes i get a feeling that ms fernandez's articles are blog posts of sorts. it does make you wonder, sometimes.
35664 wrote on Mar 14, '08
shelah said
sometimes i get a feeling that ms fernandez's articles are blog posts of sorts.
neh. they're diary entries. complete with the hotdog eating and all.
shelah wrote on Mar 14, '08
AND she gets paid for it.

*grits teeth like michael bolton*
35664 wrote on Mar 14, '08
shelah said
michael bolton
said i love you, but i lied!
shelah wrote on Mar 14, '08
*whisper* hepe...?
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 15, '08
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/09/blogs

the guardian writers name 50 of their most powerful blogs. familiar entries are dooce (number five), gawker, jezebel (separate entries; good stuff, ladies!), and the offside.
shelah wrote on Mar 16, '08
*forwards link to ms fernandez*
smartsimpleton wrote on Mar 17, '08
heh.
Add a Comment